Data de votação: 07-01-2020
Proponente: Marco Bernasocchi
Proposal: Documenting new features is difficult, and documentation lags behind code. Proposal: Mandate that all new features are accompanied by documentation (which should be in a well described, parsable section of the PR description).
Votos: A favor: Anita, Marco, Paolo, Tim Abstain: Jürgen
Decisão: Aprovada
Notas: nenhuma
Date of voting: 2020-03-18
Proponente: Alessandro Pasotti
Proposal: The proposal is to make a revision of the current cookbook text and code snippets in order to: - update the text and the code snippets - put ALL code snippets under the existing automated Python test CI infrastructure. See thread at: https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2020-March/008282.html
Budget: 4000 €
Votes: In favour: Paolo, Marco, Anita, Tim, Andreas, Jürgen
Decisão: Aprovada
Notas: nenhuma
Data de votação: 2020-03-17
Proponente: Marco Bernasocchi
Justificativa: O ordenamento atual reflete a história dos aplicativos QGIS para celular em que o QGIS para android (e seu QField com novo nome) entrega todo o trabalho base no qual a entrada foi baseada ( https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/725)
+1 Anita
+1 Paolo
+1 Marco
+1 Tim
+1 Jürgen
+1 Andreas
Data de votação: 2020-03-17
Proponente: Marco Bernasocchi
Proposal: see https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/727
+1 Tim
+1 Jürgen
+1 Andreas
+1 Marco
+0 Anita
Date of voting: 2020-04-07
Proponente: Paolo Cavallini
Rationale: Free software should be the first choice for all the tools we use. We should choose proprietary alternatives only when it is proven that free software fails to provide a reasonable solution. The PSC should vote in case a proprietary solution is suggested.
+1 Jürgen
+1 Paolo
+1 Andreas
+1 Marco
+1 Anita
Data de votação: 2020-04-15
Proponent: Anita Graser
Proposal: https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2020-April/008639.html
Rationale: The grant process has been enhanced as discussed in https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/31
+1 Anita
+1 Tim
+1 Andreas
+1 Marco
+1 Jürgen
+1 Paolo
Motion from last month: “Free software should be the first choice for all the tools we use. We should choose proprietary alternatives only when it is proven that free software fails to provide a reasonable solution. The PSC should vote in case a proprietary solution is suggested.”
Date of voting: 2020-05-12
Proponent: Tim Sutton
Proposal: The following steps should apply to both a) new solutions as well as b) replacement solutions:
Someone proposes a new or replacement platform.
They propose a migration strategy for existing content that needs to move to that platform (if applicable).
They propose who will do the migration (if applicable).
They propose what, if any, funding implications there are.
They propose a timeline for the migration/rollout.
They describe how the infrastructure is managed and if it is self-hosted (e.g. do we have backups, who has admin, who fixes issues).
We vote on it having been given reasonable time to consider the above information and test out the alternative.
Assuming we vote to agree with the proposal.
We then start using the new platform.
Vote:
+1 Tim
+1 Marco
+1 Anita
-1 Paolo
+1 Alessandro
Jürgen
+1 Andreas
Date of voting: 2020-06-03
Proponent: Anita
Proposal: fund QGIS Server documentation enhancement (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/184) and Documentation Grant Proposal (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/183) directly from the documentation budget
Votes: In favour: Marco, Jürgen, Anita, Andreas, Alessandro, Paolo
Decisão: Aprovada
Notas: nenhuma
Date of voting: 2020-06-03
Proponent: Andreas
Proposal: voting members can select up to 6 proposals they want to support (each proposal gets 1 point) with no ranking of the selected ones
Votes: In favour: Marco, Jürgen, Anita, Andreas, Alessandro Abstain: Paolo